The ugly truth is that true conservatives have always been and most likely always will be a minority in America. Making America better has nothing to do with increasing the size of the Republican party and conservatism in America. Conservatives have always been a minority in America. Its not our job to be big, its our job to be right! When we take the high ground of righteousness and justice we win, but when we compromise our moral goodness and offer ourselves up as a milder version of a democrat, we loose every time!

If Republicans want our American republic to be great, it will only happen by staying true to our conservative convictions, a small decentralized government, aka: states rights, respect for personal freedom, respect for life, low taxes, individual responsibility, and all the rest that goes along with a free people who love God and this marvelous country He gave us.

Where our country goes from here is up to you.

We have in America today a kind of Sir Lancelot. You may have heard tell of him. He is Sir Rush of the Limbaugh clan. He is widely known as the great defender of the RINO realm. He speaks for the RINOs across the land, as he wages war upon his black stallion to keep them in power and a maintain their place of privilege in the ruling class of America. He protects all the RINOs, from the lower class RINO Representatives in the House of the Commoners, to the most very elite of the elitists in the High House of the Lord Senators. He continues to protect them all. He even extends his crooked sword to protect the great RINO, Lord Romney, even after his failed attempt to usurp the evil socialist King Obama.

Sadly, Sir Rush suffers from the effects of a plague he contracted while living on the east left coast. His plague is the plague of hypocrisy, and the severest effect of the plague that harms Sir Rush is the curse of irrelevancy. Yes, Sir Rush is quickly becoming politically irrelevant.

This plague Sir Rush suffers from was contracted when he lost his character through self indulgence, brought on by compromise. It is suspected Sir Rush lost his character when he adopted the position of the east coast progressives at FOX News that the flipper Lord Romney was not a RINO, but just a Massachusetts Yankee in an east coast king’s court.

There is not much hope for Sir Rush these days, for even now he continues to defend Lord Romney, inventor of American socialized health care. Sir Rush seems to agree that Lord Romney really does know better than the conservative surfs he opposed in the primaries. Sir Rush even blames those lazy, worthless, low information tea drinkers for failing to vote and thereby causing poor Lord Romney to be exiled back to his wives in Utah.

Rupert–

Rep. Vern Buchanan (R-FL) – failure to mention his ownership of six financial entities, witness tampering with a FEC probe, being investigated by the FBI

Rep. David Rivera (R-FL) – ethics and financial violations, being investigated by the FBI

Rep. Michael Grimm (R-NY) made their dishonorable mentions list.

Great reporting and we will watch here on RINOList.org for corrupt Republicans in 2013!

HAT TIP to Judicial Watch

On the other hand, Willard Mitt Romney, is the worst possible choice for an alternative to our communist president. As governor of the most liberal State in the Union, he aligned himself with pro-abortionists, proponents of same sex marriage, and unlawful gun grabbers, while imposing a mandatory health care system that was the blueprint for Obama Care. One of the great unpublished failures of Romney, is the fact that his health care system has for practical purposes bankrupted the State of Massachusetts. Federal money is all that has kept the State out of bankruptcy court. This is the guy who claims he will fix all our problems by reforming the tax code, and drilling for oil. Romney has been known as a RINO for years, and he consistently displays the signature characteristic of a RINO, he’s a flip flopper. He takes the most expedient position on whatever issue he is confronted with. This is the reason he agrees with Obama on most of his positions when he debates him. If Romney is elected, the future of America will certainly be different. One of the primary differences will be that the Republican party will get the blame for the Depression that’s likely coming next year!

Rupert –

To begin with one must understand that the motive of behavior I speak of can be understood as a “state of being”, or in a legal sense as a “culpable mental state”. By way of explanation, there are generally four mental states of being in regards to a persons actions.

The first state of being I speak of is negligence, which is also referred to as accidental behavior. If a person drops a can of soda pop on the ground because they lost their grip on the can, we call it an accident. It was not their intention to drop the can of soda, but they could have been more careful and perhaps not dropped the can. You should note that even though dropping the can was an act of negligence or an accident, the person who dropped the can is still responsible for the consequences that arise from dropping the can. They are responsible to clean up the mess! This state of being is the reason a police officer must only prove that a person is driving their car beyond the speed limit to convict them in court of speeding. The law only requires a negligent state of being to prove guilt in most traffic offenses.

Next comes the state of being known as recklessness. If a person operates a vehicle beyond the posted speed limit of 65 miles per hour on a particular highway, say at a speed of 80 miles per hour, they are negligent in the eyes of the law, and guilty of speeding. They should have been more careful to watch their speed, but if that person operates their vehicle at say 120 miles per hour in a 35 mile per hour zone, they now are in the state of being of recklessness, and are now guilty of reckless operation of a motor vehicle. Reckless operation of a motor vehicle is driving in a way that is dangerous to the point of almost certainly producing a tragic result, and it is a jail-able offense in virtually all jurisdictions. The difference in state of being between being negligent and reckless, is that when a person is reckless they should know better than to do the thing because the thing they do will likely produce a particular result.

Following recklessness in the continuum of states of being, is what is referred to as a knowing state of being. A person is knowingly responsible for committing a particular act when they do a thing expecting a particular outcome. Doing something with the state of being of knowing what you are doing is beyond being negligent or reckless. If a person takes a soda pop from inside a cooler in a convenient store and walks out without paying for the soda pop, while remarking to the clerk, “put this on my account, on account that I’m not paying for it,” the person has knowingly taken the property of another and is guilty of theft.

Next is the most direct state of being a person will possess, the state of being known as purposefulness. A person who shoots a clerk six times in the chest while he robs a convenient store, did not do so negligently, or recklessly, or even knowingly, but did so purposely. This person did the shooting with the purpose to kill the clerk. When a person acts with a purposeful state of being they are doing a thing with purpose to create a particular result.

There is level of a purposeful state of being that is more severe, where the circumstances of such a state of being are what is referred to as being aggravated. When a person does a thing with purpose, but he plans the thing in advance of doing it, his state of being is modified by the advance planning and becomes aggravated purposefulness. As an example, if a person plans to kill his wife’s lover in advance, for say three months, making all sorts of advanced preparations as to avoid capture, he is planning to commit aggravated murder. Murder must be done with purposefulness, and aggravated murder is done with planning and aforethought.

Understanding these states of being is important for a RINO hunter, so he won’t be fooled by a slick talking flip-flopper. What I mean is this, suppose a certain person is seeking to be elected president of the United States, and said certain person has a tradition of politics in his family. Let us say his mother was a senator and his father was a governor who also ran for president, and this same certain person has himself been a governor in the most, lets say liberal State in the USA. Let us also say that for a Republican to be elected governor in said liberal State he cannot espouse traditional conservative values if he hopes to be elected governor. While seeking election to said liberal State said politician makes public resolution after public resolution for a period of years confirming his liberal godless positions on things like, the murder of innocent babies, requiring citizens of said liberal State to purchase health insurance that they don’t want, signing gun bans into law, approving of homosexual marriage, making way for illegal aliens to violate the laws of the United States of America, and many other rank liberal positions. Then suddenly said politician claims to have an epiphany and changes all of his liberal godless positions to conservative god-fearing ones, while at the same time he declares that he is now seeking election to the office of president, and he knows that a rank liberal with said godless positions can never be nominated as a Republican candidate. This same politician changes all of his positions on things like the sanctity of life, the second amendment, immigration, health care, and he now claims that he is a conservative, and he claims that he has always been a conservative. Use your noodle here please and recognize that such a person has purposely deceived many a folk, and HE IS A RINO!!!!!!!!!!

Please take note, if it looks like a duck, and it quacks like a duck, and it waddles like a duck, and it has feathers like a duck, and its white like a duck, and it has an orange beak like a duck, IT JUST MIGHT BE A DUCK!!!!!!!!!!

And if the duck claims to be a horse, don’t believe him just because he has pretty hair and a lot of money, remember he purposefully stated for years and years that he was a duck and proud of it, and now all of a sudden he claims he is a horse, DON’T BELIEVE HIM!!!!!!!!!!

Be a good RINO hunter, don’t believe what they say, believe what they do, and believe what they do, they do on purpose.

–Rupert

The List of Republicans supporting this bill are:

Gov. Bentley Ala.
Gov. Branstad Iowa
Gov. Christie N.J.
Gov. Daniels Ind.
Gov. Haley S.C.
Gov. Haslam Tenn.
Gov. LePage Maine
Gov. Sandoval Nev.
Gov. Snyder Mich.
Former Gov. Barbour Miss.
Former Gov. Bush Fla.
Sen. Alexander Tenn.
Sen. Enzi
Sen. Blunt Mo.
Sen. Boozman Ark.
Sen. Corker Tenn.
Rep. Ellmers N.C.
Rep. Pence Ind.

Hattips & Shameless plugs:

Breitbart.com
@TreeTreeTweeTs

Check out RINO List 2012 for $3.97 on Kindle 
Also, check out the paperback for $7.97

–Rupert

has just pulled out a double barreled shotgun and shot himself in both feet simultaneously.

If you don’t know, it was Team Romney that worked to undermined the McCain/Palin ticket against Obama by sabatoging Palin to major media outlets.  The Prowler from the American Spectator had the article about that and said:

Former Mitt Romney presidential campaign staffers, some of whom are currently working for Sen. John McCain and Gov. Sarah Palin’s bid for the White House, have been involved in spreading anti-Palin spin to reporters, seeking to diminish her standing after the election. “Sarah Palin is a lightweight, she won’t be the first, not even the third, person people will think of when it comes to 2012,” says one former Romney aide, now working for McCain-Palin. “The only serious candidate ready to challenge to lead the Republican Party is Mitt Romney. He’s in charge on November 5th.”

And now he wants Conservatives to get behind him to beat Obama now, because its the right thing to do since he is not that woman from Alaska.

Lord says it very succinctly:

Historically, people who are trashed by their own party employ the one entirely fatal weapon they have at their disposal: they stay home in November.

Will you abstain from Romney or cast a vote for a RINO who will NEVER listen to you and your Conservative beliefs?  Its your vote.

In the same vein, I would like to announce a similar sentiment.  I agree with Rush that Obama’s polices should fail, and I hope they do.  I also hope that the policies and philosophies of Mitt Romney fail as well.

The fundamental philosophy of Mitt Romney is Mitt Romney.  I know that seems to be Conservative and Ron Paul Supporter boilerplate, however it has been the consistent interpretation of Mitt Romney.  Mitt Romney has consistently said what he believes the audience in front of him wants to hear.  Please read the comment by the Editorial Board of the Wall Street Journal:

The problem is not that Mr. Romney is willing to reconsider his former thinking. Nor is it so much that his apparent convictions always seem in sync with the audience to which he is speaking at the moment. … Plenty of politicians attune their positions to new constituencies. The larger danger is that Mr. Romney’s conversions are not motivated by expediency or mere pandering but may represent his real governing philosophy.  Editorial, “Romney’s Convictions,” Wall Street Journal, February 1, 2008.

This philosophy of duplicity is seen best through the opposition research done by John McCain.  McCain worked up a 200 page paper that outlines every single Romney misstep in his ascendency into the national spotlight.  It reads like the history of some of the most liberal California Democrats.  Michael Brendan Dougherty from Business Insider had a run down of the top 14 flip-flops from McCain’s paper. Here they are in their entirety:

1 On Immigration – For A Path To Citizenship, Then Against

FLIP: “Gov. Mitt Romney expressed support … for an immigration program that places large numbers of illegal residents on the path toward citizenship … Romney said illegal immigrants should have a chance to obtain citizenship.”  (Evan Lehmann, “Romney Supports Immigration Program, But Not Granting ‘Amnesty’,” The Lowell Sun, 3/30/06)FLOP: “[I] think I’m best off to describe my own positions. And my positions, I think I’ve just described for you – secure the border, employment verification and no special pathway to citizenship. I feel that’s the course we ought to take.” (CNN’s “The Situation Room,” 5/22/07)

2 On George W. Bush’s Tax-Cuts

FLIP: “[R]omney spoke at the 10th annual legislative conference organized by U.S. Rep. Martin T. Meehan (D-Lowell) and met with the Massachusetts delegation. … Congressional sources said that a point of contention arose when Romney refused to take a position on Bush’s massive, 10-year tax cut plan.” (Noelle Straub, “Romney Talks Policy With Bush Staffers, Mass. Delegation,” Boston Herald, 4/11/03)FLOP: “McCain opposed President Bush’s tax cuts, Romney noted. ‘I supported them,’ the former governor said.” (Lee Bandy, “Romney Targeting McCain,” The State [SC], 2/4/07)

3 Anti-Reagan then, now Pro-Reagan.

FLIP: “I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I’m not trying to return to Reagan- Bush,” Mitt Romney said during a debate with Ted KennedyFLOP: ”‘Ronald Reagan is one of my heroes,’ Romney said as he praised Reagan’s strategy for winning the Cold War: ‘We win; they lose.’” (Michael Levenson, “Romney Links Gay Marriage, US Prestige,” The Boston Globe, 2/26/05)

4 On The National Rifle Association And Gun Laws

FLIP:  “[Romney] said he will take stands that put him at odds with some traditional ultra- conservative groups, and cited his support for the assault rifle ban and the Brady gun control law. ‘That’s not going to make me the hero of the NRA,’ he said. ‘I don’t line up with a lot of special interest groups.’” (Andrew Miga, “Mitt Rejects Right-Wing Aid,” Boston Herald, 9/23/94)FLOP:  Romney told a Derry, N.H., audience, ‘I’m after the NRA’s endorsement. I’m not sure they’ll give it to me. I hope they will. I also joined because if I’m going to ask for their endorsement, they’re going to ask for mine.’” (Glen Johnson, “Romney Calls Himself A Longtime Hunter,” The Associated Press, 4/5/07)

5 On Whether He Even Owns A Gun (This story changed within just a few days)

FLIP: “I have a gun of my own. I go hunting myself.I’m a member of the NRA and believe firmly in the right to bear arms,” Romney said. (Glenn And Helen Show, www.glennandhelenshow.com, 1/10/07)FLOP: “Asked by reporters at the gun show Friday whether he personally owned a gun, Romney said he did not.He said one of his sons, Josh, keeps two guns at the family vacation home in Utah, and he uses them ‘from time to time.’” (Scott Helman, “Romney Retreats On Gun Control,” The Boston Globe, 1/14/07)

6 Is the planet warming? Mitt probably agreed with you at one time or another.

FLIP: “I think the global warming debate is now pretty much overand people recognize the need associated with providing sources which do not generate the heat that is currently provided by fossil fuels …” (Jack Coleman, “Massachusetts Governor Urges Use Of Alternative Energy,” Cape Cod Times, 3/14/03)“I concur that climate change is beginning to [have an] effect on our natural resources and that now is the time to take action …”(“Romney OK With Plan On Emissions,” Boston Herald, 7/24/03)FLOP:  “I have to tell you with regards to global warming that that’s something, which, you’re right, the scientists haven’t entirely resolved, but no question about one thing, it’s getting warmer, and a lot of good reasons for us to use less energy, to use it more efficiently and to develop sources here in this country that could allow us to be more independent of foreign sources.” (CNBC’s “Kudlow & Company,” 2/7/07)

“Unfortunately, some in the Republican Party are embracing the radical environmental ideas of the liberal left. As governor, I found that thoughtful environmentalism need not be anti-growth and anti-jobs. But Kyoto-style sweeping mandates, imposed unilaterally in the United States, would kill jobs, depress growth and shift manufacturing to the dirtiest developing nations. Republicans should never abandon pro-growth conservative principles in an effort to embrace the ideas of Al Gore.” (Romney For President, Press Release, 2/23/07)

7 Don’t Ask Don’t Tell? Don’t Ask Mitt Romney

FLIP:  In 1994 “[Romney] called President Bill Clinton’s ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ military policy ‘the first of a number of steps that will ultimately lead to gays and lesbians being able to serve openly and honestlyin our nation’s military.’” (Dan Balz and Shailagh Murray, “Mass. Governor’s Rightward Shift Raises Questions,” The Washington Post, 12/21/06)FLOP:  “[Romney] defended his policy switch on gays in the military. He said when he first heard the phrase ‘don’t ask, don’t tell,’ he thought it was ‘kind of a silly phrase that didn’t make a lot of sense.’ But the last 10 years have convinced him that the policy is working and there is no reason to change it, he said.”  (Alexa Aguilar, “Romney Campaigns In Chicago,” Chicago Tribune, 4/12/07)

8 Has your position on same-sex marriage changed? So has Mitt Romney’s.

FLIP:  When a 2002 Constitutional Amendment was proposed to ban same-sex marriage, Romney opposed it. “Romney’s family members signed the petition to put it on the ballot ‘without reading the fine print,’ [Romney aide Eric] Fehrnstrom said, but he has no reason to believe they do not support it. ‘Mitt did not know they signed it, and Mitt does not support it,’ he said. ‘As far as Mitt is concerned, it goes farther than current law, and therefore it’s unnecessary.’” (Rick Klein, “Romney Kin Signed Petition To Ban Same-Sex Marriage,” The Boston Globe, 3/22/02)FLOP: “Just two weeks before lawmakers resume a Constitutional Convention to vote on a proposed ballot initiative to ban same-sex marriage, Gov. Mitt Romney will stand with the supporters of the measure to call on the Legislature to back it. Romney will join petition backers in a State House press event today to urge the Legislature to pass the Protection of Marriage Amendmentwhen the Constitutional Convention reconvenes July 12, authorizing a 2008 ballot question asking voters to define marriage as between one man and one woman.” (Kimberly Atkins and Kate Gibson, “Mitt Joining Supporters Of Anti-Gay Wed Initiative,” Boston Herald, 6/28/06)

9 On embryonic stem cell research, Romney’s still developing a fully-formed position.

FLIP:  “Speaking at a bioethics forum, GOP gubernatorial hopeful Mitt Romney yesterday endorsed embryonic stem cell research… [Romney] endorsed embryonic stem cell research, saying the controversial science might one day help treat his wife’s multiple sclerosis in addition to numerous other degenerative diseases. … Romney spoke extensively about his position on stem cell research, which also involves embryo destruction.” (Raja Mishra, “Romney Endorses Stem Cell Research, Is Silent On Cloning,” The Boston Globe, 6/14/02)FLOP: …On Feb. 10, 2005 … Romney came out strongly against the cloning technique … He vowed to press for legislation to criminalize the work. Romney’s opposition stunned scientists, lawmakers, and observers because of his past statements endorsing, at least in general terms, embryonic stem cell research.” (Scott Helman, “Romney’s Journey To The Right,” The Boston Globe, 12/17/06)

10 Favorite Book? Well, that depends.

FLIP: FOX NEWS’ MARTHA MCCALLUM:  And an interesting response to his favorite novel. ROMNEY: “Actually the one by L. Ron Hubbard, I hate to think … I’m not in favor of his religion by any means, but he wrote a book called ‘Battlefield Earth’ that was a very fun science fiction book.” (Fox News’ “Fox & Friends,” 4/30/07)FLOP (Maybe just a hedge): “Asked about his comments during a Fox News interview Monday that L. Ron Hubbard’s ‘Battlefield Earth’ is his favorite novel, Romney said Huckleberry Finnis his favorite fiction and that the book by Hubbard, who founded Scientology, is his favorite science fiction reading.” (Mary Anne Ostrom, “Education Should Determine Immigrants’ Legal Status, Mitt Romney Says,” The [San Jose, CA] Mercury News, 5/1/07)

11 His Own Health-Care Initiative. He’s Not Sure About That Either.

FLIP: “In a Colonial-era hall, with a fife-and-drum corps marching in with him, Gov. Mitt Romney (R) signed a bill Wednesday requiring all Massachusetts residents to purchase health insurance– portraying the measure as a historic solution to health-care costs, even as questions emerge about whether the state can afford it. The signing [was] staged with a near-presidential attention to theatrics and slogan-bearing banners…” (David A. Fahrenthold, “Mass. Marks Health-Care Milestone,” The Washington Post, 4/13/06)FLOP: “As governor of Massachusetts he signed a bipartisan law intended to ensure that every resident has coverage. Romney touted it as an innovative free-market solution. Yet these days, Romney … is much more likely to present his state’s universal coverage law as not a model to copy but an example for other states to learn from. He’s now a critic of his own biggest achievement.” (Sean Higgins, “Ex-Gov. Romney Keeps Distance From His Own Mass. Health Plan,” Investor’s Business Daily, 3/7/07)

12 Tax Pledges are beneath Romney, until the presidency was in front of him.

FLIP: “Four years ago, Mitt Romney broke with GOP tradition and refused to sign the [Americans for Tax Reform] pledge[to ‘oppose and veto any and all efforts to increase taxes’].” (Lisa Wangsness, “Healey Will Sign Antitax Pledge,” The Boston Globe, 9/4/06)“Romney’s Gubernatorial Campaign Spokesman, Eric Fehrnstrom, Dismissed Such Pledges At The Time As ‘Government By Gimmickry.’” (Scott Helman, “Romney Finds ‘No New Taxes’ Promise Suits Him After All,” The Boston Globe, 1/5/07)FLOP: “Almost five years after he refused to sign a ‘no new taxes’ pledge during his campaign for governor, Mitt Romney announced … that he had done just that, as his campaign for the 2008 Republican presidential nomination began in earnest.” (Scott Helman, “Romney Finds ‘No New Taxes’ Promise Suits Him After All,” The Boston Globe, 1/5/07)

13 Money in politics? Sometimes its good, sometimes it is bad.

FLIP: “Romney also said he advocates spending limits on congressional elections, even suggesting that the current race against Sen. Edward M. Kennedy should have a $6 million spending cap.” (Frank Phillips, “Romney, Vowing To Live It, Touts Congress Reform Plan,” The Boston Globe, 7/27/94)“[Mitt Romney] once touted dramatic restructuring measures such as taxing political contributions and placing spending limits on federal campaigns.” (Alexander Bolton, “Romney’s About-Face On Campaign Funding,” The Hill, 2/8/07)FLOP:  “Romney noted his foe from Arizona wrote the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform law that restricts certain types of contributions. ‘That’s a terrible piece of legislation,’ Romney said.‘It hasn’t taken the money out of politics. … (But) it has hurt my party.’” (Lee Bandy, “Romney Targeting McCain,” The State, 2/4/07)

14 NOW THE BIG ONE: During his 1994 Senate Run, Mitt Romney argued that he was more pro-choice than Ted Kennedy

FLIP: “When Kennedy called him ‘multiple choice,’ Romney demanded an extra rebuttal. He revealed that a close relative died of an illegal abortion years ago and said, ‘Since that time, my mother and my family have been committed to the belief that we can believe as we want, but we will not force our beliefs on others on that matter, and you will not see me wavering on that.’” (Joan Vennochi, “Romney’s Revolving World,” The Boston Globe, 3/2/06)

“I believe that abortion should be safe and legal in this country. I have since the time that my mom took that position when she ran in 1970 as a US Senate candidate. I believe that since Roe v. Wade has been the law for 20 years we should sustain and support it.” (Joan Vennochi, “Romney’s Revolving World,” The Boston Globe, 3/2/06)

(continued) When he went to conservative Utah, that tune changed.

FLOP:  “When I am asked if I am pro-choice or pro-life, I say I refuse to accept either label.” (Glen Warchol, “This Is The Place, But Politics May Lead Romneys Elsewhere,” The Salt Lake Tribune, 2/14/99)

But I’m running for office in Massachusetts again, so I’m pro-choice again

FLIP: “I will preserve and protect a woman’s right to choose, and am devoted and dedicated to honoring my word in that regard. I will not change any provisions of Massachusetts’ pro-choice laws.” (2002 Romney-O’Brien Gubernatorial Debate, Suffolk University, Boston, MA, 10/29/02)

In 2002, Romney Offered His Completed NARAL Questionnaire, Filled Out With “Mostly Abortion-Rights Positions,” To The Media Even Before Returning It To NARAL. “Yesterday, Romney also aimed to head off confusion about his stance on abortion rights by answering a Mass National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League questionnaire with mostly abortion-rights positions. He offered the questionnaire to the press even before he returned it to MassNARAL…”

FLOP: Then he started thinking of national office as a Republican. ANd he happened to have a revelation

FLOP: “Romney said he had a change of heart on the issue after speaking with a stem-cell researcher, Dr. Douglas Melton. Romney claims Melton said  ‘Look, you don’t have to think about this stem cell research as a moral issue, because we kill the embryos after 14 days.’‘It hit me very hard that we had so cheapened the value of human life in a Roe v. Wade environment that it was important to stand for the dignity of human life,’ Romneysays.” (Karen Tumulty, “What Romney Believes,” Time, 5/21/07)

The list sadly goes on,
and on
and on!

As Republicans, which Mitt Romney are we voting for?  Which one will show up as President?  Will Romney represent Conservative ideology or Liberal thought on various issues?   Those are legitimate questions to ask with the FACTS of Romney’s own statements and behaviors.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWDJEc92d38&

Another dangerous feature of having a RINO as a Republican Presidential nominee is that normally Conservative commentators spend their time making excuses for RINO ideology.  If the Tea Party movement is to become a true reform movement, it will do well to soundly reject the Conservative commentators that bail water for RINO Romney as he destroys our Party’s core belief structure.

His speeches can only be taken in and of themselves, because on the morrow he will need to amend whatever he said before.  This Mitt Romney, the one that changes his core opinions in order to accomplish his own goals, is the Mitt Romney that I hope fails, whether or not he is promoting Conservative beliefs.

I urge Conservatives to write in a candidate of their choice or to abstain from the Presidential vote.  It does not matter who others vote for, it matters who we vote for or in this case who we do not vote for.  Your vote is too precious to spend it on Romney just because you are afraid of Obama.  When someone makes the argument that if you don’t vote for Romney, you are voting for Obama, they are urging you to vote scared.  They are urging you that unless you vote against your beliefs then bad things will happen.  Ignore them.  Vote for someone because you believe that person is best suited to present your beliefs.  If you agree with soft Socialism, then vote Obama.  If you believe in whatever Romney believes in right now, then vote for Romney.  But if you believe in Conservatism’s belief in smaller government then you should not vote for either candidate, because neither believes in Smaller Government.  Don’t vote scared, vote proudly what you believe, whether or not you think it will win.  You voted, you spoke in the greatest way that you can politically.  Keep speaking through your vote.  That is the loudest sound that our government hears.

Blessings from the amazing God of our Great Republic.  May God save our Republic so that this nation will not perish from the Earth.

Lewis Beeler Jr.
President and Founder of RINOList.org

The report starts by saying:

Rep. Becky Carney, a five-term Democrat from Charlotte, burst into tears after mistakenly voting with Republicans to override Democratic Gov. Bev Perdue’s veto of the contentious legislation. The measure lifts the ban on hydraulic fracturing as a means for mining for natural gas.

Our hats off to the newest Non-RINO award recipient!

Go ahead and give Ms. Carney a phone call thanking her for granting the freedom to pursue happiness to the great state of North Carolina.

Rep. Becky Carney
919-733-5827
Becky.Carney@ncleg.net